Monday, March 12, 2012

Year of Protest


1968 looked like a worldwide political revolution to the people that had lived through it. There was a really big number of unrelated protests that happened in some European and U.S. Cities in 1967. After this, there was an increased enthusiasm for democracy and challenged many other countries around the world. This is because the world wanted change after the war, where over 20,000 Americans died in. Many Vietnamese soldiers and civilians also died in this war, and because of this, many people were upset. Some people that were upset were some American people, students in Berlin, and Germany, who had sponsored the Vietnamese. In the United States, Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated. This caused many students to protest the violence that was occurring in their own countries. 

What had started the protesting begin?


How had this year effected the years to come?

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Ich bin ein Berliner


1. What is the author arguing?
The author is arguing that communism is an inferior type of government compared to democracy and that the free world will triumph over communism. Kennedy is also saying that “equality and self-determination were the very essence of freedom.” I also think that Kennedy is saying that if you go to war, then this will cause a big split between the people that think it is right to go to war and those that think it is wrong to go to war.

2. How does the author appeal to logos (logic), pathos (emotional quality), and ethos (the writer’s perceived character) with their argument?

Ethos:
John F. Kennedy's character shows confidence and awareness. John F. Kennedy shows confidence by implying that the free world will always be better than communism. I say this because in this document he keeps saying “Let them come to Berlin”. I think this means that John F. Kennedy has enough confidence to show the communists what happened to Berlin dealing with the communistic state and the how strong Berlin was. This was indicated by John F. Kennedy saying “I know of no town, no city, that has been besieged for eighteen years that still lives with the vitality and the force and the hope and the determination of the city of West Berlin!” His character also shows awareness because he was aware that more communist societies could come up and try to do what the communistic countries had done in the Cold War. JFK warns the possible communist countries that they could face against cities like West Berlin, cities that could hold out even if it was divided in two and besieged for 18 years and still have as much determination as West Berlin had.

Pathos:
John F. Kennedy is only appealing mostly to emotions in my opinion. JFK was giving this speech in West Berlin and was saying how great of a city West Berlin is; like if he was boasting on how good the city was. I think JFK gave this speech to keep up morale and make the people of Berlin to think that it was necessary to stop the countries that were communist and waging war against the free world because the communistic society did not give normal freedoms to the people that were living in the country.

Logos:
JFK said these things to help the residents of West Berlin to stay as a democracy because of what they have already went through. I think that he secretly knew that if the people of West Berlin knew what they had done and the sacrifices that they made, they will more likely stay as a democracy. I say this because JFK must have been a smart person to have been president. This could have meant that he was trying to help create freedoms for the people that didn't have the same freedoms that he had in America.



3. What is the historical significance/relevance of this document?

This is considered one of John F. Kennedy's most famous speeches because he talks about what the free nations stood for. “The right for individuals to make their own choices in their lives and for freedom to flourish” were some of the things that the free nations stood for. This speech was given at West Berlin and compared West Berlin to some other cities and towns by saying that he didn't know any city that was as determined as it was. This was also his address to other possible communist countries to say this is how much strength the free world has; and challenged the communist countries to look at Berlin before doing anything.
 
4. Do you find the author’s argument convincing? Why or why not?

I find the author's argument convincing because JFK is saying that the free world is better than communist dictatorship. I find this very right because if you look at who had won the war and how West Berlin had faced the siege for eighteen years. The way the author put the phrases about Berlin were in a good order. These phrases all ended with “Let them come to Berlin!” and there was a sense of pride coming from the phrases, as if to say that Berlin was a starting point to show how good democracy was to the whole world.

Monday, March 5, 2012

Black Nationalism


1. What is the author arguing?
I think Malcolm X is arguing that Black Nationalism should bring freedom and justice to the African Americans and is demanding change to free them from racial discrimination and oppression. He says that something has to be done about the way they have been treated over the last three hundred years and is determined that something should change in the country. He says that Black Nationalism is the only choice that they have, and says that the blacks cannot be equal if they just expect it to happen and do nothing about it. He encourages the people that they should to stop relying on other people for freedom. I liked this quote a lot because it applies in so many different ways and is inspiring as well, "Once we see that all these other sources to which we've turned have failed, we stop turning to them and turn to ourselves.” Malcolm also says other times of attempting to get the same rights as white people, but have failed. Like when Kennedy came into office and said he would give blacks equal rights if the blacks voted for them but he ended up not doing that. He takes the direct approach to civil rights by empowering the black community with an idea that they need to fight for the freedom and civil rights that they deserve. Unlike Martin Luther King Jr. who promoted a peaceful approach, Malcolm X suggests a more violent approach toward hate and discrimination.

2. How does the author appeal to logos (logic), pathos (emotional quality), and ethos (the writer’s perceived character) with their argument?
Malcolm X appeals to logos many time. He does this by talking about the certain promises of freedom and rights that were supposed to help the blacks but never happened. He also talks about Kennedy releasing the troops when the blacks fight back after the white people have their dogs bite the black women and children. When these dogs were biting the black women and children, Kennedy had said that they were not violating any laws and he could not do anything to fix it, but right when the blacks start defending themselves, Kennedy takes out the troops and sends them to the blacks that are fighting back and there still wasn't a new law saying that they could do that. Malcolm also says that nationalism has worked in other areas which brought freedom and independence to those other countries. He says "When we look at other parts of this Earth upon which we live, we find that black, brown, red, and yellow people in Africa and Asia are getting their Independence. They are not getting it by singing "We shall overcome." No, they are getting it through Nationalism. It is Nationalism that brought about the independence of the people in Asia."
Malcolm X appeals to pathos when he expresses emotion in the form of anger. He talks about empowering beliefs of the Africans and giving them more rights by any way they can get those rights. He emphasizes how the Africans were forced into slavery and taken against their will and that they were taken from their homes. “We didn't land on Plymouth Rock, Plymouth Rock landed on us.” is what he said during this part of his speech. You can see his emotion in his speech and see that he is willing and ready to fight no matter what.
Malcolm X appeals to ethos by implying that he is a victim and he has suffered through the same things that others have and they aren't alone. He states that "All of us have suffered here, in this country, political oppression at the hands of the white man, economic exploitation at the hands of the white man, and social degradation at the hands of the white man." He also appeals to ethos when his speech sounds racist but says "The white man is not inherently evil, but America's racist society influences him to act evilly." His character is very hard to read since a lot of his speech don't follow up with each other.

3. What is the historical significance/relevance of this document?
Malcolm's speech empowered African American citizens to act by fighting against racial discrimination and segregation by rioting and doing whatever they could to be free from the white mans racial slurs and abuse. His speech caused the black community to believe in themselves and fight back for equal rights whenever they were mistreated. He stood up and encouraged his people that Black Nationalism was the key to independence and freedom.

4. Do you find the author’s argument convincing? Why or why not?
I find his argument very convincing. I say this because the black people were not being treated the same way as the white people. Other groups of people were finding their freedoms but the African Americans were not getting any rights because they were not doing anything as a group to get rights. I think that the way he talked was the most convincing thing about the speeches. For example, he was straight to the point and was strong and said “this is what had happened and this is what we should do and this is what will happen to us if we don't do it.” He says that the group should help themselves instead of relying on others to for help. A really good example of this is when he says "It is a duty, it is your and my duty, as men, as human beings, it's our duty to our people, to organize ourselves. Let the government know if they don't stop that Klan, we'll stop it ourselves.”

Monday, February 20, 2012

G.I. Bill CDL


The Serviceman's Readjustment Act of 1944, also known as the G. I. Bill. This was a law that provided college for returning World War II veterans. This law also gave the veterans one year of unemployment compensation. It also provided many different types of loans for returning veterans to buy homes and start businesses and farms. It reached every veteran who had been on active duty during the war years for at least ninety days and had not been dishonorably discharged. The veteran did not have to be in a combat situation, but just had to be on active duty during the war.

Why did the government think that more G.I.s would take advantage of the G.I.Bill for unemployment then for education?

How did the schools feel when the G.I. Bill was being passed and why did they feel this way?